Martha can be the polished, sophisticated business woman. Martha can be the girl next door. If you’re looking for a cute nickname there’s Marty, but Martha is great on its own.
Martha has much credibility. The biblical name also happens to be the name of the US’s very first, first lady.
Martha’s time for a revival has almost passed. She peaked in the 1880s, around the same time as other modern revival names, Anna and Emma, that have been popular for almost a decade already. Anna has already begun to decline.
However, parents may not have grown tired of the 1880s yet. For proof, see Alice and Clara’s recent rise: Alice jumped approximately 28 places in 2010, ranking at 172, and Clara has been climbing steadily the past decade, ranking slightly ahead of Alice at 167.
Yet Martha continues to decline, dropping over 300 places the past decade, ranking at 709 in 2010. I’m not sure why this is, but I’m not really concerned with why, but rather I want to draw attention to an underused gem.
Like many names that appeal to parents, Martha can have many faces. In addition to the first-first lady, there’s:
- Model-turned-stockbroker-turned-entrepreneur, Martha Stewart
- 80’s MTV personality, Martha Quinn
- Fox News personality, Martha MacCallum
- And finally, Martha Plimpton who may not be a household name, but whose face would be recognized from several movies, notably The Goonies and Beautiful Girls. Currently she has a regular role in the hit Fox comedy, Raising Hope (another fantastic name).
My husband’s grandmother is Martha, and there’s a good chance many of today’s parents have a grandmother, great-grandmother or great-aunt Martha. The name stayed close to the top 30 until around World War II.
I myself had briefly considered Martha as a middle name had our son been a girl. But its hard to say if Martha could have ended up on another birth certificate in our family.
When I first mentioned Martha as a potential middle name to Rob, his response was, “Like in Martha Washington. That’s cool.”
When he started nixing every girl name on my list, I thought dispite my dislike of alliteration with our M last name, perhaps Rob would agree to Martha as a first name.
When I mentioned Martha again, his response was, “Martha? Isn’t that sort of old?”
And that is the most likely reason Martha is still on the decline; she is still seen as “old” to many modern parents. Why some great-grandmother names are seen as charmingly vintage while others are seen as dusty relics is sometimes a mystery.
Consider this though: Martha has more history and stability than early 20th century flash-in-the pan Gladys. While Gladys still ranked lower than Martha in 2010, I had met a little Gladys at my daughter’s library playgroup. The other parent’s reaction to Gladys on a little one was positive.
Personally, I would much rather see a little Martha, a name that has the same classic charm as Anna and Emma. Adding even more potential, those stylish Brits appreciate Martha, ranking her at 85 in 2010. As mentioned in my post on nickname names, the UK trends are sometimes a precursor to US trends.
For those looking for something a little more exotic and spunky there’s Marta with origins in several European countries, including Spain, Portugal, Poland, Norway, and Italy. Marta was also one of the children in The Sound of Music.
Before I began to consider Martha, I had turned to Marta three or four years ago. Martha still seemed a bit dusty to me at the time. However, after realizing the appeal of Martha, I like that name even more than Marta now.
Readers: What do you think of Martha? Is Martha a dusty relic or come back kid?