Timeless Yet Trendy Baby Names

Vintage Portrait of two Babies in an Old Fashioned Antique Baby Carriage Buggy
Fashionable yet personal. Appealing yet unique. These are the golden means for baby names. What about timeless yet trendy?

One might think timeless and trendy are opposites that can never co-exist, but often the term “trendy” is used interchangeably with “faddish”. There is a subtle difference between trendy and faddish.

Many parents will insist they don’t want a trendy name, but most people are influenced by the trends. And that’s not always a bad thing. A trendy name isn’t necessarily a bad name. When parents say they don’t want a trendy name, what they really mean is they don’t want a fad name.

Semantics aside, I could think of a few timeless-trendy names off the top of my head. I made it my mission to find more timeless-trendy names. These names are more plentiful than one might realize.

Names that are timeless yet trendy fit current trends, such as popular vowels, letter-endings and themes, but were used occasionally before they followed a popular trend. Some are on the rise and others are on the decline. Either way, timeless-trendy names were familiar long before they followed the trends.

When deciding how familiar names were at any given time, I check the Social Security top 1000 baby names from 1880 (the earliest year data is available) to 2012. Timeless names don’t see a lot of dramatic peaks and troughs in popularity; their rankings remain relatively steady. Most timeless names have never left top 500 since 1880, but ideally the name should have never dipped below the top 300. (This is the same criteria I used to decide what I consider an underused classic name.) Fad names, however, come and go. Fad names were obscure, most likely outside the top 1000, and then suddenly skyrocket in popularity or go through dramatic changes in popularity.

None of the timeless-trendy names on this list have had any dramatic popularity spikes since 1880, (but some may have had some gentle peaks and troughs, as most names do). Girls are coded pink, boys are coded blue, and unisex names are coded green.

Name Trend(s) Highest Rank Lowest Rank 2012 Rank
Adrian Ends in N #56 in 2011 #663 in 1884 #60
Alexander Letter X #4 in 2009 #233 in 1959 #9
Antonio Ends in O #71 in 1976 #976 in 1894 #118
Calvin Letters L & V / Ends in N #44 in 1924 #231 in 2009 #189
Carmen Ends in N #141 in 1968 (on girls*) #752 in 1882 (on girls) #331 (on girls)
Evelyn Letters L & V / Ends in N #10 in 1915 #289 in 1977 #27
Faith Word Name #48 in 2002 Below #1000 in 1883 & 1887 #75
Felix Letter X / Vintage #137 in 1884 #394 in 2002 #316
Hope Word Name #144 in 1999 Below #1000 in 1888 #220
Ivan Letter V / Ends in N #113 in 2012 #404 in 1881 #113
Julia Long U #26 in 1880 #142 in 1977 #65
Julian Ends in N / Long U #50 in 2011 #367 in 1962 #53
Laura Letter L / Vintage #10 in 1969 #280 in 2012 #280
Leo Letter L / Ends in O #38 in 1903 #486 in 1995 #134
Lillian Letter L / Ends in N #10 in 1889-91 #486 in 1978 #25
Lorenzo Letter L / Ends in O #240 in 1880 #459 in 1919 #307
Lucia Letter L / Long U #240 in 2011 #729 in 1974 #248
Lucy Letter L / Long U / Vintage #44 in 1880-81 #588 in 1978 #66
Martin Ends in N / Vintage #45 in 1818 #265 in 2012 #265
Max Letter X #96 in 2011 #419 in 1969 #105
Molly Nickname Names #74 in 1991 #499 in 1898 #90
Naomi Vowel Dominant #81 in 2012 #421 in 1969 #81
Nathan Ends in N #20 in 2004-05 #273 in 1947 #29
Olivia Letters O, L & V / 4 syllables #3 in 2009 #543 in 1971 #4
Owen Letter O, Ends in N #38 in 2012 #520 in 1970 #38
Simon Ends in N / Vintage #142 in 1886 & 1888 #556 in 1965 #255
Veronica Letter V / 4 syllables #68 in 1983 #465 in 1880 #316
Victoria Letter V / 4 syllables #16 in 1998-99 #269 in 1936 #28

* Carmen has historically been a lot less popular on boys than girls. Carmen on boys has spent the past few decades outside the top 1000. It peaked on boys at #308 in 1928.

Many of these names rank in the top 50 now, which might be too popular for those seeking something different. Three of these names appear on the upswing and peaked just last year: Ivan, Naomi, and Owen.

But what these names lack in uniqueness, they make up for in staying power. These names have other selling points besides following a trend. The names on the list that are popular now, are more likely to endure over time long after the trend has run its course.

Not all names on this list are common. Some are even on the way down, such as Veronica and Victoria, despite their current trend appeal. There are two names from this list that hit their lowest rank in 2012: Laura and Martin.

Regardless of where these names fall on a numbered list, they all suit a person through every stage of life and as a bonus happen to be very current.

Readers: Which timeless yet trendy name is your favorite? Are there any other names you would add to this list?

Photo credit

2012 Baby Names: Boy Top 1000 Newcomers

Neymar_celebrating_(cropped)Earlier this week, we covered which girl names were new to the top 1000 in 2012, and now the focus is on the boys.

Just like with the girl’s list, not all names new to the top 1000 are included in this list. For example, names that were too similar to already popular names, such as variant spellings, were excluded. The purpose of this exercise is to glean upcoming trends.

Before we get to 2012’s top 1000 newcomers, here is how 2011’s newcomers did:

2011 2012 Trend
Arlo #915 #818 Up
Benton #939 #879 Up
Brecken #964 #860 Up
Cristiano #978 Unranked Down
Crosby #739 #670 Up
Enoch #995 #935 Up
Maksim #967 Unranked Down
Maxton #949 #884 Up
Miller #932 Unranked Down
Otto #931 #784 Up
Zeke #976 #868 Up

Wow! The boy’s outshone the girl’s this time, with 70% of 2011’s newcomers ranking higher in 2012. One of the big winners was Otto. Crosby continues to soar.

A little side-note: Last year I speculated that I was unsure if Cristiano would soar or fizzle. The name appears to bridge an old trend (the Chris family, being the Portuguese cousin of Christian) with a new trend (o-ending names), and I wasn’t sure which trend would win out. For a moment, there was some discussion in the blogosphere that Christian would become more popular due to the Fifty Shades of Grey series. (See the links under “Sources” after this post.*)

I had my doubts. The idea of moms naming their sons after a sadomasochist seemed far-fetched regardless of the book’s popularity. Also, no matter how successful the novel, a novel isn’t enough to revive any name past its fashion-peak. While Christian is less dated than other Chris names, it peaked a little over five years ago. The Chris trend appears to be on the way out after a couple of strong decades.

Based on the 2012 baby name numbers, I was right.** Christian’s popularity doesn’t seem affected by the books. Christian continues its gentle fall, ranking at #33 in 2012, down from #30 in 2011. In the end, trends usually win. As Christian declines, the o-ending wasn’t enough to keep Cristiano in the top 1000 for another year.

Now on to the 2012 newcomers:

Apollo – Debuted at #993. First time charter. Ancient mythological names are coming into style for girls, clear by the growing popularity of Athena (#247) Daphne (#420) and Penelope (#125). Now these names might be catching on with the boys too. Apollo is one of two Greek mythology names on this list.

Jionni – Debuted at #870. First time charter. “Never underestimate the impact of reality TV,” I keep telling myself. Frankly, I don’t understand it, but apparently many parents are influenced by reality TV when it comes time to pick a name. Jionni LaValle is reality TV star Nicole “Snooki” Polizzi’s fiance.

Neymar – Debuted at #699. Anytime I see a name hit the top 1000 for the first time, and the debut rank is higher than #750, I take notice. Like baby name phenomenon Iker, Neymar most likely reached notoriety thanks to a foreign football (or as Americans call it soccer) star. Neymar da Silva Santos Júnior is a Brazilian football star, known mostly by his first name.

If Neymar repeats the baby name success of Iker, it could be in the top 300-350 within three years. Iker hit the chart in 2010 at #646 and continues to be one of the fastest rising boy names. In 2012 it ranked at #230.

Oakley – Debuted at #880. Last charted in 1920. This name spent some time at the bottom of the top 1000 over a century ago, and seems like a good revival candidate. This surname may be most familiar from Annie Oakley. Oakley is also a place-name and a manufacturer of sunglasses. Perhaps Americans were inspired by the British. In the U.K. Oakley was close to the top 200 at #222 in 2011.

Thiago – Debuted at #862. First time charter. This Portuguese name fits the o-ending trend, but also might hint at an emerging trend: the TH beginning. The TH beginning is found in fashionable Theodore (#197), and Thaddeus which has held steady in the 900s (a #903), but I feel is a name to watch. But the biggest influence could be international football (or soccer in America). Thiago Silva is a Brazilian football player.

Titan – Debuted at #961. First time charter. This is yet another ancient mythological name on the newcomer list. This name’s first-time chart presence could be linked to the growing popularity of Titus, which ranked at #360.

Last year’s list represented some established trends: n-ending names, o-ending names, surnames, and the Max family. This year this list is a little different. The boy newcomers seem inspired by pop culture events such as Brazilian football (soccer). A new trend for boys, Greek mythology is also represented on the boy’s list. In time, we will know which of these names will climb and which ones are one-shot deals.

Readers: Which new top 1000 boy name do you like best?

*Sources:

http://www.fashionnstyle.com/articles/5957/20130412/hot-baby-names-2013-list-revealed-christian-fifty-shades-grey-movie-casting-pregnant-kate-middleton-choose-one.htm
http://shelf-life.ew.com/2012/11/30/fifty-shades-of-grey-baby-names/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/05/baby-names-2013_n_3016970.html#slide=2301308
http://nymag.com/thecut/2013/04/would-you-name-your-baby-after-fifty-shades.html
http://www.cosmopolitan.com/celebrity/news/2013-baby-names-weird

** While I may have been right about Christian’s popularity, I could be wrong about the ‘Fifty Shades’ influence on baby names. The protagonist’s last name, Grey, has gained some attention as a by name. Grey is still outside the top 1000, but has increased a little on BabyCenter. This growing popularity, of course, is probably not entirely attributed to the character, but also the growing popularity of Grayson and Greyson, which were at #85 and #174, and trending upwards.

Photo credit: By Fotos Gov/Ba (Neymar) [CC-BY-2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

2012 Baby Names: Girl Top 1000 Newcomers

baby-girl-foot-in-mouthLast week, the Social Security Administration released the top baby names for 2012. Today I will share some names that are either completely new to the top 1000 (since 1880, the earliest year data is available) or are returning after being absent for decades.

Not every top 1000 newcomer was included in the list, only names that seem promising. Alternative spellings of more popular names are not included. Promising newcomers are similar to fashionable names, excluding names that are too similar (such as Aubriana, which is grouped into the Aubrey family).

Before we list the 2012 newcomers, here is how the 2011 newcomers did:

2011 # 2012 # Trend
Amalia #988 Unranked Down
Avianna / Aviana #832 / #764 #933 / #856 Down
Elliot (on a girl) #872 #861 Slightly Up / Plateau
Geraldine #961 #989 Slightly Down / Plateau
Hattie #993 #709 Up
Juniper #951 #883 Up
Liv #950 Unranked Down
Nova #883 #624 Up
Temperance #937 #841 Up

 

Overall, 2011’s top newcomers are doing pretty well. The big success stories are Hattie and Nova. Juniper and Temperance are doing respectably well. On last year’s poll (which is still open) Hattie and Juniper are the clear winners (at time of writing).

Now on to the 2012 newcomers:

Adley – Debuted at #731. First time charter. With a debut this high, I suspected there must be a pop culture connection, and I was right. Adley was the name of a female contestant on The Voice last year. With the high debut accompanying a pop culture reference, Adley exhibits a big sign of a fad name.

Nameberry lists Adley in their database as masculine, but considering its similarity to Hadley (#130 and rapidly rising), and loose similarity to Adele (#536 and rapidly rising) Adley makes sense as a feminine name.

Annalee – Debuted at #910. First time charter. This combo of Anna + Lee represents compound names which are beginning to get some attention. For this reason, this name seemed significant despite being similar to the conventional hit, Anna (#35).

The sound is very modern and lively. Annalee is perfect for expectant parents with clashing tastes since it could be a compromise between modern and traditional. But I’m not completely convinced Annalee has long-term potential only because Avianna / Aviana from last year’s list, another “anna-name”, wasn’t one of the top performers.

Coraline – Debuted at #823. First time charter. This is one I could have easily imagined on last year’s newcomer list. Just like Juniper from last year’s list, Coraline got some love on name blogs over the past couple of years. Coraline is familiar to many Americans from the 2009 animated horror/fantasy film based on the 2002 book. There are also names very similar to Coraline that are popular.

The similar Cora has soared in recent years, ranking at #155 in 2012, a 169 place increase from its 2008 rank, #324. The similar Caroline is about 10 years past-peak, but still ranked in the top 100 at #79 in 2012.

Emmalynn – Debuted at #910. First time charter. “Wait –” some of you might be thinking, “isn’t this just another variation of Emmeline or Emmaline* which are very similar to Emma?”

That is a possibility, but more likely Emmalynn is a combination of Emma + Lynn, which further supports the emergent compound name trend. BTW — Emmeline is still outside the top 1000 and Emmaline just re-entered the chart at #890 after being absent since 1915 when it ranked at #990.

*Emmaline - was almost left off because it is very similar to Emmalynn and is yet another “emma-name”. (Emma rose slightly to #2 in 2012). However, Emmaline deserves some mention because it is another example of how some trends (in this case emma-names) endure.

Emory – Debuted at #881. This is a first time charter for girls, but was in the boy’s top 1000 as recently as 1974. This name re-entered the top 1000 for boys as well. I wondered why this name charted in 2012 on both genders. My research didn’t turn up any cultural significance for Emory in 2012. The reason Emory hit the top 1000 is a mystery to me, perhaps the sound is en vogue or Emory has personal significance for people. Emory is a place-name, being the name of several towns, geographical landmarks, and a university in Georgia.

Estella / Estelle – Debuted at #882 (hit #1000 in 2010) and #950. Last charted in the 1960s (Estelle) and 1970s (Estella). These names are in the same family as vintage hit Stella (#62), which means “star”. For this reason, Estella / Estelle almost didn’t make the cut, because names that are in the same family as already popular didn’t always make the cut.

But the vowel beginning seems to distinguish Estella / Estelle enough. And I feel Estelle, which is more removed from Stella, is the real one to watch. Estella ranks higher and seems to have more short-term potential, but I wouldn’t discount Estelle. While super popular ella-ending names may still have a few years at the top, when people finally tire of these names, the more sparse elle-ending names may see new life.

Everly – Debuted #906. First time charter. This modern take on Beverly is another path to fashionable Eva (#86) or Eve (#558) and has an energetic feel.

Jessa – Debuted at #998. This is one of those surprises. The surprise is not that Jessa is in the top 1000, the question is, what took Jessa so long?

If the huge popularity of Jessica didn’t inspire Jessa’s arrival 15-20 years ago, one would think the moderate popularity of Tessa (which has been in the bottom top 250 for about 20 years) would have spawned enough Jessa’s to push the name into the top 1000 5-10 years ago, but that never happened. The future for Jessa is uncertain, but one thing is for sure: Jessa has conventional style.

Milena – Debuted at #962. This is new to the U.S. charts but has seen some success in other countries, most recently Poland where it ranked at #20 in 2012 and has been gradually climbing their chart. The lovely smooth sound is popular among U.S. parents.

Winter – Debuted at #769. This spent some brief time in the top 1000 between 1978 and 1979 and then disappeared from the ranks until last year. Now that seasonal / calendar inspired names such as Autumn #68 and June #435 have become stylish again, parents are seeking less conventional representations of this genre, such as January and September. Winter has a good chance of sticking around a little longer this time.

Zahra – Debuted at #952. This is an Arabic name with the trendy Z that has seen some moderate success in France where it ranked #372 in 2010.

This list represents a good mix of modern and old-fashioned. At least three of the names have styles that seem to tie the past to the present: Annalee, Everly, and Jessa. And the two compound names suggest an emerging trend. The big letter seems to be E, a vowel that has always been prominent in many names, but could be getting more popular as a starting letter.

Within a week, the boy’s top 1000 newcomers will be unveiled.

Readers: Which new top 1000 girl name do you like best?

Photo credit

2012 Baby Names Are Here & How Our 2013 Rising Stars Did

newborn-babyThe 2012 names from the Social Security Administration are here!

The 2012 names were released yesterday afternoon. Seriously, the day should be a national holiday. Okay. I’m not really serious, but Name Day would make a great holiday for the growing society of name people.

And I just realized, the morning after “Name Day”, I still don’t know the new top 10 names. I just completely overlooked them. I must be recovering from the morning after the festivities!

For me, the real story is what is happening lower in the ranks, and which names are climbing and falling. I could tell you the top ten fastest climbers. I do have to check the top 10. I wonder how 2011 big climber Mason did?

But before I get to that, I will share my routine every year for the day the newest top names are released. First I check my kids’ names. Then I check the top fastest climbing names. Then I check on some names I’m watching.

One of the big names I’ve been watching is Harper (on a girl). Harper is a name I believe will eventually hit the girls’ top 10. This is one of my predictions from Upswing Baby Names Top 22 in 2022.

Harper looks like it’s headed there even quicker than I thought. Harper is now in the girls’ top 25 at #24. By 2022 Harper may have already been in the top 10 and may have begun its decline. We shall see.

Hipster favorites Adelaide and Matilda continue to climb, but not dramatically. Adelaide is at #343 and Matilda is at #658.

Now to check some other name’s I’ve been watching, the 2013 rising stars. These are names I felt had the best chance to make the 2012 top 1000 for girls and boys.

Girls

  • Cecily – Still Not There!
  • Lavinia – Still Not There!
  • Louisa – Still Not There!
  • Mabel – Still Not There!
  • Ophelia – Still Not There!
  • Persephone – Still Not There!
  • Sylvie – Still Not There!
  • Viola – Still Not There!

Score: 0 of 8.

This does not bum me out. Do you know why I like doing these predictions?

Because I will always be pleased one way or the other. If my predictions were right I could have celebrated my awesome forecasting skills, but since my predictions were all wrong I’m celebrating that these lovely names are still underused! Hooray!

I am very surprised, shocked even, that Louisa and Sylvie are still not in the top 1000. I even brought up the entire list of the top 1000 and searched and re-checked again this morning to make sure there was no mistake. But as Martha Stewart says, “It’s a good thing.”

Boys

  • Alistair – Still Not There!
  • Ephraim – Still Not There!
  • Ewan – Still Not There!
  • Lachlan – Still Not There!
  • Linus – Still Not There!
  • Magnus – Still Not There!
  • Roscoe – Still Not There!
  • Thatcher – Still Not There!

Score: 0 of 8

Missed them all again! But that has hardly ruined my day. For parents seeking outside the top 1000 names, these are still some great choices. But I’m very surprised that Lachlan and Ewan have still not hit the top 1000.

Since none of these names are in the top 1000, which names are new to those ranks? That topic is for next week.

And… big drum roll… I will begin work on the next Watch List Report with more names I am watching.

Anyone who’s on that subscriber list will automatically get the newest report once its available. And, of course, if you are not on the list, invitations will get sent out to sign-up for your copy once its available.

BTW, here’s the scoop on my kids’ names:

  • Fiona climbed (56 places ugh) and is now close to the top 200.
  • Paul continues its gentle fall.

I’m not surprised with either finding. As early as 2013 my kids’ names could cross paths while Fiona’s on its way up and Paul’s on its way down.

No matter how my kids (or their names) do, I’ve learned to be at peace and will be their champion along the way.

Readers: Do you do anything special for “Name Day”? Did you find anything fascinating about the top 2012 baby names?

Photo credit

Announcing Baby’s Name Before Birth: Yay or Nay?

baby-shower-inviteSome people are still figuring out their baby’s name 24 hours after birth. A few people take even longer to find a name, struggling for weeks–or in the case of one UBN reader–months. Rob and I were fortunate to pick our first child’s name quickly. Our first child’s name was picked at the 18 week ultrasound once we knew the sex. We had discussed names long before we knew the sex. Like many other name-people, I was making boy and girl name lists as soon as the stick read “Pregnant” (and maybe a little earlier than that).

While the name was picked relatively early in the pregnancy, there was a very practical reason Rob and I never announced the name of our first child before birth: we didn’t want to feel committed in the event we changed our minds.

There was also the concern that certain family members would give us unsolicited advice. What we told everyone was that we knew the sex and wouldn’t be able to keep that a secret, and there had to be something left for a surprise at birth.

With our second child, we found the naming process more difficult. Coming to an agreement was trickier the second time. In the end we picked a name with family significance, that I wasn’t initially thrilled with. Since the name we picked was traditional and inoffensive, and I was looking for some outside validation to get excited about the name, I found myself verbally sharing the name with a few select people. But there were an opinionated few who didn’t hear our son’s name before birth.

This was probably not the smartest decision. One of my friend’s husband liked to refer to our unborn baby by name every time he saw me. Our daughter’s third birthday was six weeks before our son was born. This inquisitive husband was at the party along with the few oblivious family members. I had fears of this friend asking, “How’s Paul?” in front of the wrong people.

One thing I never did was announce my unborn child’s name in writing. Recently I was surprised to get a baby shower invitation printed with the unborn baby’s name. Once I was at the shower, I noticed the favors had customized M&M’s with the unborn baby’s first and last name. This was shocking to me. The baby is due shortly and the expectant parents must be very committed to the name!

While I can think of several advantages of keeping an unborn baby’s name secret, I can’t think of many advantages of broadcasting an unborn baby’s name. I can only speculate that some expectant parents might get a kick out of shower attendees giving then monogrammed stuff for gifts. But ultrasound gender predictions can be wrong. And I can’t think of any disadvantages of keeping an unborn baby’s name secret.

For those who decide to keep an unborn baby’s name secret, the real challenge might be determining how to keep the secret, especially if the name is picked early in the pregnancy. When we kept our first child’s name secret, we decided to tell family members that we were keeping the name a surprise until the birth.

We considered telling a white lie and claim we hadn’t picked a name, and maybe that would have been the best option. The path we took resulted in some family members trying to coax the name out of us. Hint: these were the same family members who were kept in the dark when we decided to share our second child’s name with a few people. Had we pretended we were undecided on the name, the worst we would have endured is unsolicited name suggestions. Ah hindsight.

This leads me to wonder: how would you keep an unborn baby’s name secret? Is sharing an unborn baby’s name good or bad? Does it matter whether the name is shared verbally or in writing?

Readers: Would you share your unborn baby’s name with others?